in our public schools inside the country, the central celebration of the anniversary of the founding of the Olympics or internal school, was to bring together the winners of different specialties and different degrees, to participate in the game of "greasy pole." This game was planted in the center of the schoolyard a stick topped with beef bait. Were planted early on income and waited until the sun warmed up and leave the bait to see how slippery.
the appointed day before the whole school, parents, local authorities, the winners should climbing the greasy pole contest. At the top of the club had committed paper bags with surprises and a special award, which was usually money donated by local merchants. The expectation to see who made the award ranged from enthusiasm and effort of the participants, who had to make several attempts until one succeeds, then the bait had been melted and the wood cleaned through the efforts of the contestants-grab the perm. Many called and most had to leave for showing little talent to play. But they had the joy of being bankrupt and that if not met the award was only for the obstacle and the rules established and approved by all.
This memory is intended as a metaphor in relation to what is happening in this government in relation to the application of admission to the Public Educator. Calls have been made, and schedules have been many thousands of teachers have believed in the government's willingness to be incorporated into the CPM. But from the first contest was questioned. The main 14 as a passing note to enter the second stage.
Let us remember what has been happening with the Public Educator from about July 2009 when the same Minister of Education announced the convening of a public call for appointment Teachers in 20 thousand jobs nationwide. There was talk of a comprehensive evaluation, fair and transparent technique for selecting the best teachers would enter the first level of the Public Educator (CPM), the seats would be allocated in strict order of merit and teachers who, having achieved 70 points reached no vacancy, would have a bonus of 10 percent of the minimum grade required for the process next year. It was also said that these teachers would be eligible to be hired in the next academic year. The Minister recalled that the CPM, teachers might have better salaries, bonuses and other benefits, which enable professional development, social, cultural and economic.
a statement, the No. 7 SUTEP and interview the Secretary General of the union expressed the need to repeal the Public Educator for several reasons: a) inconsiderate and illegal (not attended by the teachers and approved by maneuvers in Congress); demagogue (does not improve the teaching profession), Timer (reducing half of the rights won) and reduced teaching duties (time hourly chronological pedagogical work (job security void, reduce the desire to make public career, to unionization, economic (halved bonuses, allowances and assumptions increases, which will be proportional (as reduced working hours) to the amounts advertised. Furthermore the government does not ensure a permanent budget to fund the Law 299062. (SUTEP: Press Release No. 07-2009-CEN-SUTEP). Slight
, indifference, cynicism was the response of those who should be the first to be made aware of a teaching reality that since a young man chooses a sum of delays, abuse and treatment of second for a career first. But do not ask the impossible. As the owner of the Plaza de Armas no daylight to pruritus education, this sector remains undaunted. Reacts when the "Master", opens his mouth. This is the case for example of extending the teaching day in two flagship schools of Lima. So no previous study without asking whether there is budget. Behind it is meant that flagship schools are a valid proposal beyond the recovery of infrastructure. They want recognition at all costs regardless. If not, why the outburst to announce this as the Presidential Message? Like Secondary College President announced last year and in force today, after they have occupied a Recreation Center for public employees and the city of Lima. Does the educational context or sickly joy of recognition in a country of ragamuffins and pelafustanes as he called Abelardo Gamarra "The Rogue"? The facts speak and cynicism is reaffirmed.
Turning to the CPM. Few recall and a CPM forum held in October last year which dealt with the Public Educator: Evaluation and Modification Project. Dr. Malpica exposure was entitled "Implementation of New Public Educator: Problems and proposals" Without doubt a well researched and critical document that far from suggesting the repeal of Act 29062, proposes three strategic priority areas of action for development of the teaching and public career of the teaching profession: "First, institutionalized forums for dialogue and negotiation tables between governments, unions and educational communities, at national, regional and local levels, on conditions of employment, conflict resolution and agreements social and economic, considering the 28411 general law of the national budget, the development of law 28175 public employment context, and the new law on national education board. / / Second delegate legislative powers to the executive branch to integrate the laws 24029, 25212 and 29062, agreeing, through decentralized and participatory processes in the framework of the national education The main proposals of amendments to the regulatory framework for the development of the teaching and public career of the teaching profession (laws, decrees, resolutions, ordinances, directives and notes) in order to resolve current problems and plan their development in the medium and long term / / / Third: to incorporate multi-year macroeconomic framework (Article 14 of Law 28411 overall national budget) agreed forecasts for budgeting and finance the implementation of strategic plans for educational development in the medium and long term within the framework of Legislative Decree 1088 (Act of the National Strategic Planning and CEPLAN) "
Since then much water has flowed under the bridge and the cold shoulder from those who have the power of reason has not been the norm. Why the political folly to address a vital issue for the betterment of our teachers? Why the government has been unable to separate the grudge against the party Patria Roja (who has hegemony in the leadership of SUTEP) and professional work?
be expressed as the reporting and announcement relating to wages was the official message, but how far were the main thing that had been given in this forum. "Haste? A lack of arguments against journalists who do not know the issues, problems and decisions educational world? Maybe. But the "rush" to announce irrelevance is no indication that management is transparent policy in the sector. We also wonder Does he know the President and Prime Minister of these "moves" of his minister?
And as always blowing pen Minister said that seven regional governments in September failed to pay the salary of a thousand teachers who entered the Level II and III of the CPM. It also called on the Regional Education Directorates to fulfill this obligation, because otherwise they would be reported to the Comptroller General of the Republic (ANDINA. Lima, October 6, 2009)
¿Quién hace el seguimiento de estos mandatos? ¿Sólo el gobierno regional? ¿A quién rinde cuentas el Ministro? Sin duda se justifica lo dicho, pero ignora y evade temas centrales de la política educativa nacional. Podemos o no estar de acuerdo ante lo planteado en el Foro convocado por la Comisión de Educación del Congreso, pero se trata de la política educativa que se viene desarrollando y que está plagada de contradicciones, contiene desencuentros y alberga futuros conflictos si no se abordan desde ahora.
El 6 de agosto vencló el plazo para aspirantes al primer nivel de la CPM. Últimamente hubo unas noticias sobre el tema que llaman la atención por la forma cómo has been distorting reality. "Institutional Management Deputy, Víctor Raúl Díaz Chávez, said that teachers have clear rules and bear witness to the appreciation of his teaching profession and the real change of their earnings to move from the old law faculty to the CPM. Congratulated teachers who have chosen the path of "meritocracy" in favor of a better quality of education for children in public school .... " (ANDINA. 04/08/1910). It should be noted that these teachers (who are the first level) have no choice but to name. Not that they have chosen voluntarily by the CPM.
next day another paper reported that "The nine thousand teachers who remained for a few points to keep in the competition for a place of appointment to the Public Educator (CMP) will be this Sunday, a second chance." (THE REPUBLIC, 08/05/1910) A note draws attention to the warning made by the Deputy Minister Corporate Management: "The Ministry of Education does not authorize or sponsor training of any kind, except those of the National Lifelong Education and Training ( PRONAFCAP) ... In this regard alerted teachers who are preparing to participate in calls to the Public Educator, to avoid getting surprised by unscrupulous using the "logo" of the Ministry of Education to benefit supporters and / or personal. He said that fliers are circulating spurious use of the logo of the Ministry of Education and partisan political organizations, inviting teachers to be trained, after payment of 80 soles, and they also offer the official certification. "The only training valid and authorized by the Ministry of Education are made by PRONAFCAP. So teachers around the country should not be left defraud naive, "he said. In that sense, the official asked teachers to report any irregularity about it." (ANDINA.05.08.10)
Why this reaction? Just today the authorities become aware of facts that have been occurring since the beginning of the process? What about the allegations of sales of the tests? What happened with unscrupulous officials remain in office while only know that a technician has been separated only because he had the awkwardness of pressing a wrong key and make a desabarajuste with the results of the tests?
A note from the press office and communications DRELM (Regional Direction of Lima), announced that "A total of 331 teachers in 2000 will yield Lima on Sunday August 8 Supplementary Qualifying Test to access the level II to V of the Public Educator (CPM). "Besides announcing that" At the national level is 8, 764 teachers will also be reassessed in the 38 local implementing institutions published on the website of the Ministry of Education. "
Another note stated that "Today, Friday is the deadline for teachers wishing to apply to the first level of the Public Educator to join one of the sites of the National Bank nationwide. The registration period went into effect on July 12 and to date there are 147 thousand applicants but expects the figure to reach 200 thousand, once the process. For this assessment can be provide all basic education teachers and technical-productive, educational degree, in business or unemployed, presenting only their National Identity and the registration form previously downloaded from the website of the Ministry of Education, duly filled in block letters . Written proof of this evaluation process will be held on 22 August. The results were published on 10 September and appointments will be effective from March 1, 2011. (ANDINA.06.08.10) Why are mixed dates and calls? Who are you confused?
A feast of ads do you little good to the image of education national and especially those with direct responsibility. Access to the CPM has become a greasy pole. Teachers going from Herod to Pilate seeking an answer to their concerns and questions. The set of figures ranging from 147 000 applicants are expected to reach 200 thousand ... That in Lima were 9 thousand, that there are 750 registered Ayacucho, indicate the total stupidity for not being able to have created an office specializing in communications CPM. The Office should develop official gazettes, with certified figures for each region. But much to ask those who have a speech for every opportunity and talk about microphone or TV camera stand in front, without saying anything substantive.
So things are. For more facilities which they say give the teachers (why the magnanimity to give back another opportunity to those who did not get the note 14?). The CPM is a greasy pole prepared by the management of the education sector responds to the desire megalomaniac President, rather than the interests that should have national education. The excitement that was the beginning of the contest, little by little it has been fading, to the point that the Ministry of Education has invested in advertising to call the teacher. Trust is not a commodity to be sold, gains on the basis of credibility. And this has little or nothing to offer industry. What
surprises in store Sunday's race 8? (08/07/1910)
