passive classes: the pensionazo arrived! PERSONAL TRANSFERS
These days, we became aware of a document from the Ministry of Public Service, presented the unions with a presence in the General Bureau of Civil Service (CCOO, UGT and CSI.F) pompously titled "harmonized measures PROPOSED CLASS OF PASSIVE SYSTEM STATE "and that there is nothing but a new and brutal curtailment of our rights as public employees, our particular" Pensionazo. "
The intention of the Secretary of State is starting, urgently, processing as Draft bill, which is why our brand new General Bureau of Civil Service, which normally meets at Easter bouquets, bears and three meetings in less than a week.
addition, new measures would be complementary to those included in Royal Decree-Law 13/2010, of December 3, in proceedings in tax matters, labor and liberalization to encourage investment and job creation, Article 20 set inclusion, from January 1, 2011, officials of new entrants to the General System of Social Security.
These measures, according to the Secretary of State herself, will affect the 900,000 officials Passive integrated into classes at 31 December 2010. Among the issues to be addressed in the reform include:
retirement age
Extension of retirement age from 65 to 67 years.
Retirement after 65 years of age, only if you trust a period of effective service to the State less than 38 years and 6 months.
early retirement after 63 years of age, if 33 years of service credited to the State troops, in this case linked to the implementation of a pension reduction factor for each quarter or fraction of a quarter below the official age retirement as appropriate.
Inclusion of a transitional period whereby, from 1 January 2013 to December 31, 2021 (or 2024 as other versions that are circulating) officials could access voluntary retirement without reduction factor provided that there is age and lack credited for establishing the year in question (would increase by 4 months per year of age and deficiency during the transitional period).
Percentage applicable to have regulator:
is proposed to amend the table of rates applicable to have regulator and increase the period of effective service to the state, from 35 to 37 years to reach 100% of their assets regulator.
Instead, try to sell candy for the inclusion of other measures harmonizing with the general system, such as:
The calculation, for the effect of pensions and retirement, the days that make up the delivery leave under current law, if that were not listed in any of the Social Security Schemes.
The accident "in itinere" so far not regulated in the Passive Class and regulations that regulate how expresa.Se now modify the rules for revocation of Article 7 of TRLCP: The economic effects of the recognition of benefits this scheme would have a retroactive up to 3 months from the first day of the month following the submission of a request, although regulate a transitional period of 4 years for the full realization of this measure.
would be amended Article 44.1 of TRLCP (conditions of entitlement to pension for parents): The condition of economic dependence would tie the minimum wage (which is the benchmark that Social Security takes place IPREM), and it assumes economic dependence when computing income does not exceed twice the SMI per household (rather than individually).
In exchange, anywhere in the document proposes no measures to match the general scheme in an area as sensitive and costly for our retired colleagues as free access to medicines.
not reflected in any of its paragraphs the possibility of partial retirement, claimed historically by our group, and clearly curtails the possibility of early retirement of teachers, the "retirement LOE."
From FEP-USE, pending a final draft of the new bill, we show our strong rejection of the measures contained in the draft, and we wonder
Was this the spirit of the commitments made in the famous Acuerdazo Government-Trade Union of 2009? And the commitments after the signing of EBEP nefarious? "In exchange for what we sold back the unions represented on the General Board? How far we have to keep holding? As I said from the USO during the negotiation of pensionazo, what need we have unions to be extras in a reform that cuts workers' rights?
Everyone can take responsibility for their actions: the Government to take legislative initiatives, the Parliament to legislate, and unions to work to improve conditions for workers. Without policies that encourage economic growth and employment, this reform will be a new patch that back pay for workers in this country, in this case, public employees. We hope that public employees will know when the time to appraise the actions of each.
Attachments:
http://www.fep-uso.es/attachments/1865_2011-03-17_medid_armoniz_regim_clas_pasiv_estad-borrador.pdf
0 comments:
Post a Comment